TECHNO-EPISTEMOLOGY IN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE: CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF NEW MEDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.1.21223Keywords:
techno-epistemology, philosophy of science, new media, digital era, knowledge, philosophy of technology, information, digital transformation, media reality, reliability of knowledge, algorithmic selectionAbstract
Introduction. The digital era is marked by radical transformations in the means of knowledge production and dissemination, driven by the pervasive application of digital platforms, algorithmic systems, and artificial intelligence technologies. In this context, new media emerge as large-scale databases where information is generated and processed in real time for entire populations rather than selected samples. These shifts alter the very architecture of knowledge, creating a hybrid informational environment in which traditional criteria of truth and justification become increasingly ineffective. These transformations are directly related to the broader questions addressed in contemporary philosophy of data and information concerning the ontological status of data and the conditions for their conversion into knowledge under digitalization. The aim and tasks. The aim of the article is to substantiate techno-epistemology as a conceptual framework for the philosophical analysis of new media under conditions of digital transformation. The tasks are: to clarify the content of the concept of «techno-epistemology» and its theoretical origins in the philosophy of technology and philosophy of science; to systematize leading approaches to technological knowledge – from Carl Mitcham’s fourfold typology to Ori Freiman’s concept of techno-trust and Marek Hetmański’s technologised epistemology; to determine the specific role of new media as constitutive factors of cognitive processes; and to analyse algorithmic selection, platformisation of content, and cyclic knowledge order as defining features of the contemporary media environment. Research methods. The study employs comparative analysis of competing epistemological concepts and an interdisciplinary synthesis drawing on philosophy of science, philosophy of technology, media studies, and social epistemology. Research results. Techno-epistemology is established as an independent direction within contemporary philosophy of science that integrates individual, social, and technological dimensions of cognition, replacing the classical justification–truth–belief triad. Technological knowledge is distinguished from scientific knowledge by a normative component evaluated not by truth but by effectiveness. New media are shown to function as constitutive factors of cognitive processes that construct, rather than reflect, media reality through algorithmic selection, personalised news feeds, and generated content. The connection between techno-epistemological analysis of new media and the philosophy of data and information is outlined as a productive direction for further research. Conclusions. Techno-epistemology is establishing itself as an independent branch of contemporary philosophy of science, integrating the individual, social, and technological dimensions of cognition, while new media act not as neutral channels but as agents in the construction of knowledge through algorithmic and platform-based mechanisms. At the same time, digital transformation drives a shift toward a process-oriented, open nature of knowledge and necessitates the development of new methodological approaches to analysing the interaction between technologies, media, and audiences, where techno-epistemology can perform a reflective function.
References
Список літератури:
Alvarado R. AI as an Epistemic Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2023. № 29 (32). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11948-023-00451-3
de Vries M. The Nature of Technological Knowledge: Philosophical Reflections and Educational Consequences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2005. № 15. Pp. 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-3616-3
Eijck M. V., Claxton N. X. Rethinking the notion of technology in education: Techno-epistemology as a feature inherent to human praxis. Science Education. 2009. № 93. Pp. 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20296
Freiman O. Towards the Epistemology of the Internet of Things: Techno-Epistemology and Ethical Considerations Through the Prism of Trust. International Review of Information Ethics. 2014. Vol. 22. Pp. 10–18.
Godler Y., Reich Z., Miller B. Social Epistemology as a New Paradigm for Journalism and Media Studies. New Media and Society. 2020. Vol. 22. Iss. 2. P. 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444819831536
Hetmański M. Technologised Epistemology. Beyond Description: Naturalism and Normativity; edited by Marcin Miłkowski and Konrad Talmont-Kaminski. Milton Keynes: College Publications, 2010. Pp. 313–327.
Mitcham C. Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 397 p.
Neuberger C., Bartsch A., Fröhlich R., Hanitzsch T., Reinemann C., Schindler J. The digital transformation of knowledge order: a model for the analysis of the epistemic crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association. 2023. Vol. 47. Iss. 2. Pp. 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23808985.2023.2185926
Serafini L. The old-new epistemology of digital journalism: how algorithms and filter bubbles are (re)creating modern metanarratives. Humanities and social sciences communications. 2023. Vol. 10. Art. 209. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01710-3
Slyusar V. M., Khrystokin G. V., Yastrebova A. O. Is dialogue possible in the post-truth era? (Media philosophy and social and communication studies). Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences. 2023. № 1 (93). P. 29–40. https://doi.org/10.35433/philosophicalsciences.1(93).2023.29-40
Слюсар В., Христокін Г., Костючков С. Сучасні філософські концепції науки: філософія даних та інформації. Культурологічний альманах. 2026. Вип. 1 (17). С. 24–32.
Yakovleva O., Slyusar V., Kushnir O., Sabovchyk A. New trends in scientific and technological revolution (STR) and transformation of science and education systems in the paradigm of sustainable development. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. № 277. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127706006
Зуєв В. М. Поняття технології у новітньому філософському дискурсі. Вісник Національного технічного університету України «Київський політехнічний інститут». Філософія. Психологія. Педагогіка. 2012. № 1. С. 30–34.
Лук'янець В. Техніка. Філософський енциклопедичний словник / НАН України, Ін-т філософії ім. Г. С. Сковороди; голов. ред. В. І. Шинкарук. Київ: Абрис, 2002. С. 637.
Соціальна філософія. Короткий енциклопедичний словник; Заг. ред. і уклад. В. П. Андрущенко, М. І. Горлач. Харків: ВМП «Рубікон», 1997. 400 с.
References
Alvarado, Ramón. 2023. “AI as an Epistemic Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (32). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11948-023-00451-3.
de Vries, Marc J. 2005. “The Nature of Technological Knowledge: Philosophical Reflections and Educational Consequences.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15: 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-3616-3.
Eijck, Michiel van, and Claxton, Nicholas Xumthoult. 2009. “Rethinking the Notion of Technology in Education: Techno-Epistemology as a Feature Inherent to Human Praxis.” Science Education 93: 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20296.
Freiman, Ori. 2014. “Towards the Epistemology of the Internet of Things: Techno-Epistemology and Ethical Considerations Through the Prism of Trust.” International Review of Information Ethics 22: 10–18.
Godler, Yigal, Zvi Reich, and Boaz Miller. 2020. “Social Epistemology as a New Paradigm for Journalism and Media Studies.” New Media & Society 22 (2): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819831536.
Hetmański, Marcin. 2010. “Technologised Epistemology.” In Beyond Description: Naturalism and Normativity, edited by Marcin Miłkowski and Konrad Talmont-Kamiński, 313–327. Milton Keynes: College Publications.
Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neuberger, Christoph, Anne Bartsch, Romy Fröhlich, Thomas Hanitzsch, Carsten Reinemann, and Julia Schindler. 2023. “The Digital Transformation of Knowledge Order: A Model for the Analysis of the Epistemic Crisis.” Annals of the International Communication Association 47 (2): 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2185926.
Serafini, Luca. 2023. “The Old-New Epistemology of Digital Journalism: How Algorithms and Filter Bubbles Are (Re)Creating Modern Metanarratives.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10: 209. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01710-3.
Slyusar, Vadym, Hennady Khrystokin, and Alina Yastrebova. 2023. “Is Dialogue Possible in the Post-Truth Era? (Media Philosophy and Social and Communication Studies).” Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences 1 (93): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.35433/ philosophicalsciences.1(93).2023.29-40.
Slyusar, Vadym, Hennadii Khrystokin, and Serhii Kostiuchkov. 2026. “Suchasni filosofski kontseptsii nauky: filosofiia danykh ta informatsii” [“Contemporary Philosophical Concepts of Science: The Philosophy of Data and Information”]. Kulturolohichnyi almanakh [Cultural Studies Almanac] 1 (17): 24–32. [in Ukrainian]
Yakovleva, Olena, Vadym Slyusar, Olga Kushnir, and Antonina Sabovchyk. 2021. “New Trends in Scientific and Technological Revolution (STR) and Transformation of Science and Education Systems in the Paradigm of Sustainable Development.” E3S Web of Conferences 277. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127706006.
Zuiev, Vitaly. 2012. “Poniattia tekhnolohii u novitnomu filosofskomu dyskursi” [“The Concept of Technology in Contemporary Philosophical Discourse”]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy ‘Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut’. Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Pedahohika 1: 30–34. [in Ukrainian]
Lukianets, Valentyn. 2002. “Tekhnika” [“Technology”]. In Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk, edited by Volodymyr Shynkaruk, 637. Kyiv: Abrys. [in Ukrainian]
Andrushchenko, Viktor, and Mykola Horlach, eds. 1997. Sotsialna filosofiia. Korotkyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Social Philosophy: A Short Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Kharkiv: Rubikon. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The scientific journal adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.
All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Copyright
Authors who publish their works in the journal:
-
retain the copyright to their publications;
-
grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;
-
agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;
-
have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.




