CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY AS A FACTOR IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF CONFLICTUAL METANARRATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.42.20999Keywords:
political epistemology, conflict metanarrative, semantic core, disinformation, manipulation, political knowledge, political governanceAbstract
The article is devoted to clarifying the significance of the political-epistemological dimension of destructive communication metanarratives in the context of studying and analyzing the semantic dimension of digital content. The aim of the study is to establish the potential of political epistemology as a factor in interpreting and identifying disinformation metanarratives. Research methods. The study combines political epistemology with rational-critical discourse analysis and uses structural-functional and institutional perspectives to assess the coherence, validity, and epistemic grounding of metanarratives in political communication and governance. Research results. Ideologized propaganda disinformation aims to undermine trust in official discourse and strengthen political and ideological positions through appeals to the epistemic foundations of collective knowledge. Political-epistemic assessment of metanarratives embedded in propaganda and disinformation reveals their consequences for governance, social stability, and the security of society’s information systems, while also highlighting its functional dimension, namely the organization of information and the establishment of epistemic priorities within the semantic core of the metanarrative. Conflictual metanarratives distort the socio-political world through framing, emotional appeals, selective evidence, and repetition as instrumental means of asserting false theses or concepts. Rational-critical discourse analysis offers tools for studying the structural capacity of political language and discourse, while political-epistemic assessment makes it possible to identify biases, hidden assumptions, and ideological motives embedded in institutions of political representation and governance. One of its promising missions, especially in modern Ukraine, is the formation of an environment of “epistemic vigilance.” Discussion. It is argued that the ability of society to politically and epistemically evaluate the applied conflict metanarratives is of strategic importance for political governance, social cohesion, and information security Conclusions. It is established that the metanarrative is an appeal to a certain “political truth”, which has a biased (ideologized) nature and aims to structure digital media messages of a lower order. It is concluded that in the conditions of Russian aggression, the political-epistemic examination of conflict metanarratives is designed to create an “intellectual network” for the formation of information sovereignty and information immunity of Ukrainian society and the state.
References
Список літератури
Горбулін В. П. «Гібридна війна» як ключовий інструмент російської геостратегії реваншу. Стратегічні пріоритети. 2014. № 4 (33). С. 5–12. URL: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/ 2014-12/st_pr4_2014_col.pdf дата звернення: 15.12.2025.
Оженван М. А. Глобальна війна стратегічних наративів: виклики та ризики для України. Стратегічні пріоритети. 2016. № 4 (41). С. 37–46. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ sppol_2016_4_6 дата звернення: 20.12.2025.
Снитко О. С., Гречка С. О. «Битва наративів» у сучасному медіапросторі України. Актуальні проблеми української лінгвістики: теорія і практика. 2022. Вип. 44. С. 86–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2022.44.86-117.
Христокін Г. В. Наративні та реальні причини російської агресії проти України. Contemporary International Relations: Topical Highlights of Theory and Practice : monograph / ed. by Z. Sharlovych, Y. Voloshyn, N. Vasylyshyna. Łomża : MANS w Łomży, 2024. P. 50–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58246/JBBJ2120.
Яворська Г. М. Динаміка наративів (до проблеми когнітивної опірності медійного простору). Стратегічні комунікації в умовах гібридної війни: погляд від волонтера до науковця : монографія / за ред. Л. Компанцевої. Київ : НА СБУ, 2021. С. 26–38.
Borinca I., Tropp L. R., Ofosu N. Meta-humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross-group interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2021. Vol. 60, №. 3. P. 1051–1074.
Chatterjee S. Engaging with an emergent metanarrative: A critical exploration of the BOP proposition. Organization. 2014. Vol. 21, №. 6. P. 888–906.
Cohen-Chen S., Crisp R. J., Halperin E. Perceptions of a changing world induce hope and promote peace in intractable conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2015. Vol. 41, №. 4. P. 498–512.
Cooper J., Fazio R. H. A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1984. Vol. 17. P. 229–266.
Deitch M., Elran M., Wattad M. S., Lavie E., Shafran Gittleman I. Findings of a survey on Jewish-Arab relations. November 2023. The Institute for National Security Studies. URL: https://www.inss.org.il/publication/spotlight-arab-jews/ дата звернення: 20.01.2026.
Gherman M. Narațiuni și metanarațiuni în războiul informațional ruso-ucrainean (2022–2025). 2026. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400396654_Naratiuni_si_metanarratiuni_in_razboiul_informational_ruso-ucrainean_2022-2025 дата звернення: 20.01.2026.
Leonelli S. Open science and epistemic diversity: Friends or foes? Philosophy of Science. 2022. Vol. 89, №. 5. P. 991–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.45.
Lorenzo D. J. Discussions of war and the necessity standard. War and American Foreign Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-66695-8_1.
O'Connor R. Conflict and its discursive representations: Sustaining support for war. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2025. URL: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-79089-8 дата звернення: 20.01.2026.
Razakamaharavo V. Exploring the roles metanarratives play in the dynamics of conflict recurrence in Madagascar. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science. 2019. Vol. 42. P. 80–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.42.4.
Ryan S. Conflict metanarratives and peacebuilding. Routledge Companion to Peace and Conflict Studies. London: Routledge, 2019. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/ edit/10.4324/9781315182070-32/conflict-metanarratives-peacebuilding-stephen-ryan (ата звернення: 15.12.2025.
References
Horbulin, Volodymyr. 2014. "Hibrydna viina yak kliuchovyi instrument rosiiskoi heostratehii revanshu." [Hybrid War as a Key Instrument of Russia's Geostrategic Revanche]. Stratehichni priorytety [Strategic Priorities] 4 (33): 5–12. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/ 2014-12/st_pr4_2014_col.pdf
Ozhevan, Mykola. 2016. "Hlobalna viina stratehichnykh naratyviv: vyklyky ta ryzyky dlia Ukrainy." [Global War of Strategic Narratives: Challenges and Risks for Ukraine]. Stratehichni priorytety [Strategic Priorities] 4 (41): 37–46. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/sppol_2016_4_6
Snytko, Olena, and Stanislav Hrechka. 2022. "Bytva naratyviv u suchasnomu mediaprostori Ukrainy." [The Battle of Narratives in the Contemporary Ukrainian Media Space]. Aktualni problemy ukrainskoi linhvistyky: teoriia i praktyka [Current Issues in Ukrainian Linguistics: Theory and Practice] 44: 86–117. https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2022.44.86-117
Khrystokin, Hennadii. 2024. "Naratyvni ta realni prychyny rosiiskoi ahresii proty Ukrainy." [Narrative and Real Causes of Russian Aggression against Ukraine]. In Contemporary International Relations: Topical Highlights of Theory and Practice, edited by Z. Sharlovych, Y. Voloshyn, and N. Vasylyshyna, 50–65. Łomża: MANS w Łomży. https://doi.org/10.58246/JBBJ2120
Yavorska, Halyna. 2021. "Dynamika naratyviv (do problemy kohnityvnoi opirnosti mediinoho prostoru)." [Dynamics of Narratives: Towards the Problem of Cognitive Resilience of the Media Space]. In Stratehichni komunikatsii v umovakh hibrydnoi viiny: pohliad vid volontera do naukovtsia [Strategic Communications in Hybrid War: A View from Volunteer to Scholar] edited by L. Kompantseva, 26–38. Kyiv: NA SBU.
Borinca, Iulia, Linda Tropp, and Nils Ofosu. 2021. "Meta-Humanization Enhances Positive Reactions to Prosocial Cross-Group Interaction." British Journal of Social Psychology 60 (3): 1051–1074.
Chatterjee, Sayan. 2014. "Engaging with an Emergent Metanarrative: A Critical Exploration of the BOP Proposition." Organization 21 (6): 888–906.
Cohen-Chen, Smadar, Richard Crisp, and Eran Halperin. 2015. "Perceptions of a Changing World Induce Hope and Promote Peace in Intractable Conflicts." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (4): 498–512.
Cooper, Joel, and Russell Fazio. 1984. "A New Look at Dissonance Theory." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 17: 229–266.
Deitch, Mora, Meir Elran, Mohammed S. Wattad, Ephraim Lavie, and Idit Shafran Gittleman. 2023. Findings of a Survey on Jewish-Arab Relations. November 2023. The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). https://www.inss.org.il/publication/ spotlight-arab-jews/
Gherman, Marin. 2026. Narațiuni și metanarațiuni în războiul informațional ruso-ucrainean (2022–2025). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400396654_Naratiuni_si_metanarratiuni_in_razboiul_informational_ruso-ucrainean_2022-2025
Leonelli, Sabina. 2022. "Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?" Philosophy of Science 89 (5): 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.45
Lorenzo, David J. 2021. "Discussions of War and the Necessity Standard." In War and American Foreign Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66695-8_1
O'Connor, Ryan. 2025. Conflict and Its Discursive Representations: Sustaining Support for War. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-79089-8
Razakamaharavo, Voahangy. 2019. "Exploring the Roles Metanarratives Play in the Dynamics of Conflict Recurrence in Madagascar." Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 42: 80–104. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.42.4
Ryan, Stephen. 2019. "Conflict Metanarratives and Peacebuilding." In Routledge Companion to Peace and Conflict Studies. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/ chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315182070-32/conflict-metanarratives-peacebuilding-stephen-ryan
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The scientific journal adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.
All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Copyright
Authors who publish their works in the journal:
-
retain the copyright to their publications;
-
grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;
-
agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;
-
have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.
