ON THE QUESTION OF ATTENTION IN THE WORKS OF SIMONE WEIL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.1.21244

Keywords:

attention, Simone Weil, contemplation, culture, science, religion, philosophy, imagination, self-development

Abstract

Introduction. The article is dedicated to the analysis of a specific aspect of Simone Weil’s philosophy, -attention, which functions as a mechanism that allows the individual to progress on the path of self-development. Simone Weil is known not only as a religious philosopher but also as a social theorist. The author’s research focuses on analyzing two philosophical texts by S. Weil: «Reflections on the Right Use of School Studies with a View to the Love of God» and «Тhe Notebooks». Specificity of commenting on «Тhe Notebooks» lies in their fragmentary nature and the abundance of allusions and references by the French author to various philosophical traditions and concepts. The aim of the article is to investigate the question of attention in the context of Simone Weil’s philosophy and to elucidate the interconnections between attention, contemplation, vision, and individual force; as well as to reveal the disposition between imagination and reality within the framework of the question of attention. The primary task of the study is to analyze Simone Weil’s works in the context of the question of attention. The research methods: hermeneutic, systemic, philosophical. Research results. It is clarified what place the concept of attention occupies within the framework of Simone Weil's philosophical system, and it is determined which philosophical traditions she combines in the context of her own philosophical reflection. The conclusions emphasize that attentive contemplation is a path for overcoming temporal confinement, informational oversaturation, and the dependence of 21st-century individuals on modern technologies.

Author Biography

Petrenko Petrenko , National University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”

Candidate of Cultural Studies, Deputy Dean for Research and International Activities of the Faculty of Humanities and Arts.

References

Список літератури:

Вейль С. Сила. Згода. Справедливість. Любов. Зло. Львів: Shrapnel, 2024. 96 с.

Декарт Р. Міркування про метод, щоб правильно спрямувати свій розум і відшукати істину в науках. Київ: Тандем, 2001. 101 c.

Козловський В. Кантове вчення про чуттєвість, простір і час: трансцендентальні, антропологічні та природничо-наукові конотації. Sententiae. 2024. Т. 43, № 3. С. 81–98. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.03.081.

Лао-Цзи. Даодецзін. Всесвіт. 1998. № 10. С. 118-133.

Платон. Держава. Київ: Основи, 2000. 355 с.

Подмазін С. Свідомість: між діяльністю і спогляданням. Мультиверсум. Філософський альманах. 2021. № 2 (174), т. 1. С. 157–171. https://doi.org/10.35423/ 2078-8142.2021.2.1.09

Фуко М. Наглядати й карати. Київ: Комубук, 2020. 392 с.

Cahiers Simone Weil [Електронний ресурс]. URL: https://www.simoneweil-association.com/ (дата звернення: 14.11.2025).

Campbell M. «As an Emerald is Green». Waiting, Poetry and Affliction: Simone Weil’s Concept of Attention. Dublin: Dublin City University, 2023. 234 p.

Roberts P. Education and the ethics of attention: the work of Simone Weil. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2023. Vol. 71, no. 3. P. 267–284. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00071005.2022.2109589.

The teaching of Buddha. Tokyo: Kosaido Co, 2005. 298 p.

Weil S. Waiting for God. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2009. 208 p.

Weil S. Œuvres complètes. Tome I: Premiers écrits philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1988. 456 p.

Weil S. Œuvres complètes. Tome II, vol. 2: Écrits historiques et politiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1991. 648 p.

References:

Weil, Simone. 2024. Syla. Zghoda. Spravedlyvist. Liubov. Zlo [Power. Agreement. Justice. Love. Evil]. Lviv: Shrapnel.

Descartes, René. 2001. Mirkuvannia pro metod, shchob pravylno spriamuvaty svii rozum i vidshukaty istynu v naukakh [Discourse on the Method of Rightly Directing One’s Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences]. Kyiv: Tandem.

Kozlovskyi, Viktor. 2024. “Kantove vchennia pro chuttievist, prostir i chas: transtsendentalni, antropolohichni ta pryrodnycho-naukovi konotatsii” [Kant’s Doctrine on Sensibility, Space, and Time: Transcendental, Anthropological, and Natural-Scientific Connotations]. Sententiae 43 (3): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.31649/ sent43.03.081.

Lao-Tzu. 1998. “Daodejing.” Vsesvit [Universe] 10: 118–133.

Platon. 2000. Derzhava [The Republic]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Podmazin, Serhii. 2021. “Svidomist: mizh diialnistiu i spohliadanniam.” [Consciousness: Between Activity and Contemplation]. Multiversum. Filosofskyi almanakh [Multiverse. Philosophical Almanac] 2 (174): 157–171. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2021.2.1.09.

Foucault, Michel. 2020. Nahliadaty i karaty [Discipline and Punish]. Kyiv: Komubuk.

Cahiers Simone Weil. n.d. https://www.simoneweil-association.com/.

Campbell, Mary. 2023. “As an Emerald is Green”. Waiting, Poetry and Affliction: Simone Weil’s Concept of Attention. Dublin: Dublin City University.

Roberts, Peter. 2023. “Education and the Ethics of Attention: The Work of Simone Weil.” British Journal of Educational Studies 71 (3): 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00071005.2022.2109589.

The Teaching of Buddha. 2005. Tokyo: Kosaido Co.

Weil, Simone. 2009. Waiting for God. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Weil, Simone. 1988. Œuvres complètes. Tome I: Premiers écrits philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard.

Weil, Simone. 1991. Œuvres complètes. Tome II, vol. 2: Écrits historiques et politiques. Paris: Gallimard.

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Petrenko , P. (2026). ON THE QUESTION OF ATTENTION IN THE WORKS OF SIMONE WEIL. Proceedings of the Kyiv Aviation Institute. Series: Philosophy. Cultural, 1(43), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.1.21244