JUST WAR: A TELEOLOGICAL APPROACH AND THE STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF CARL VON CLAUSEWITZ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.1.21235Keywords:
just war theory, Clausewitz, hybrid warfare, information aggression, AI ethics, jus ad bellum, jus in belloAbstract
Introduction. The article examines the possibility of integrating Carl von Clausewitz’s teleological conception of war with the normative principles of just war theory under the conditions of contemporary hybrid warfare. Particular attention is paid to information aggression and to the ethical challenges arising from informational influence on civilian populations. The aim and tasks. The aim of the study is to develop a teleological approach to just war theory by synthesizing Clausewitz’s strategic conception of war with the doctrines of jus ad bellum, jus in bello, and jus post bellum. The tasks include clarifying the teleological foundations of war in Clausewitz’s philosophy, analysing the ethical criteria of just war theory in relation to hybrid warfare, and determining the moral and legal limits of informational and cognitive influence in the context of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Research methods include philosophical analysis, comparative analysis of classical and contemporary theories of war, elements of international humanitarian law analysis, and case-oriented examination of informational aggression within hybrid conflict. Research results. The study demonstrates that Clausewitz’s conception of war as the continuation of politics by other means provides a teleological basis for evaluating the legitimacy, proportionality, and political purpose of military actions. The integration of strategic teleology with just war theory extends ethical analysis to informational and cognitive dimensions of warfare. The proposed approach establishes criteria for distinguishing legitimate defensive informational actions from aggressive disinformation practices, including proportionality, political legitimacy, verifiability of information, and responsibility for civilian harm caused by manipulative informational influence. The risks of AI-mediated information warfare are also outlined. Discussion. The results indicate that hybrid warfare transforms the classical boundaries between military and non-military forms of conflict. Compared with traditional just war theory, the proposed approach expands ethical analysis toward informational violence and digital forms of aggression. Conclusions. The synthesis of Clausewitzian teleology and just war theory provides a productive philosophical framework for analysing hybrid warfare in the digital age. The proposed approach makes it possible to interpret informational aggression within broader ethical and political categories of contemporary armed conflict and contributes to the philosophical analysis of defensive actions in informational warfare.
References
Список література
Арендт Г. Про революцію / пер. з англ. Київ : Дух і Літера, 2005. 640 с.
Бистрицький Є. До онтології війни: чому військові дії, а не мирні перемовини. Філософська думка. 2023. № 2. С. 74–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2023.02.074.
Гроцій Г. Про право війни і миру / пер. з лат. Харків : Фоліо, 2015. 448 с.
Джигора О. М. Етика війни та мирного врегулювання. Філософія та управління. 2024. № 1. С. 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2024.1.07.
Клаузевіц К. фон. Про війну / пер. з нім. Київ : Видавництво «Військова академія», 2006. 560 с.
Колибаб’юк С. П., Щербін Л. В. Філософія війни з погляду української історіографії. Вісник науки та освіти. 2025. № 6 (36). С. 1425–1439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2025-6(36)-1425-1439.
Ковальський Т. Ключові особливості розуміння концепту «справедлива війна» у філософії ХІХ ст. Наукові записки НаУОА. Серія «Філософія». 2025. № 29. С. 90–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25264/2312-7112-2025-29-90-95.
Локк Дж. Два трактати про врядування / пер. з англ. Київ : Темпора, 2016. 320 с.
Шевців М. Б. Історико-філософська рефлексія війни. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. Серія юридична. 2016. Вип. 2. С. 96–104.
Шевцов О. В. Військово-теоретичні аспекти трактування війни на основі теорії Карла фон Клаузевіца. Вісник НА ДПСУ. 2021. № 3. С. 1–15.
Требін М. П. Концепція справедливої війни. Філософія у сучасному світі : матеріали V Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. (Харків, 22–24 листопада 2024 р.). Харків, 2024. С. 181–185.
Fabre C. Cosmopolitan War. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012. 328 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199551072.001.0001.
Frowe H. The Ethics of War and Peace: An Introduction. London : Routledge, 2011. 288 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203808404.
ICRC. Jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Geneva : International Committee of the Red Cross, 2024. URL: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/jus-ad-bellum-jus-in-bello.
McMahan J. Killing in War. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009. 400 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199548668.001.0001.
Orend B. The Morality of War. Peterborough : Broadview Press, 2006. 512 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781551116698.
Walzer M. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 5th ed. New York : Basic Books, 2015. 416 p.
References
Arendt, Hannah. 2005. Pro revoliutsiiu [On Revolution]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.
Bystrytskyi, Yevhen. 2023. “Do ontolohii viiny: chomu viiskovi dii, a ne myrni peremovyny” [“Towards the Ontology of War: Why Military Actions, Not Peace Negotiations”]. Filosofska dumka [Philosophical Thought] 2: 74–98. https://doi.org/10.15407/ fd2023.02.074.
Grotius, Hugo. 2015. Pro pravo viiny i myru [On the Law of War and Peace]. Kharkiv: Folio.
Dzhohora, O. M. 2024. “Etyka viiny ta myrnoho vrehuliuvannia” [“Ethics of War and Peace Settlement”]. Filosofiia ta upravlinnia [Philosophy and Management] 1: 55–63. https://doi.org/10.70651/3041-248X/2024.1.07.
Clausewitz, Carl von. 2006. Pro viinu [On War]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo “Viiskova akademiia”.
Kolybabiuk, Svitlana, and Liliia Shcherbin. 2025. “Filosofiia viiny z pohliadu ukrainskoi istoriohrafii” [“Philosophy of War from the Perspective of Ukrainian Historiography”]. Visnyk nauky ta osvity [Bulletin of Science and Education] 6 (36): 1425–1439. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2025-6(36)-1425-1439.
Kovalskyi, Taras. 2025. “Kliuchovi osoblyvosti rozuminnia kontseptu ‘spravedlyva viina’ u filosofii XIX st.” [“Key Features of Understanding the Concept of ‘Just War’ in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy”]. Naukovi zapysky NaUOA. Seriia ‘Filosofiia’ [Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy. Series: Philosophy] 29: 90–95. https://doi.org/10.25264/2312-7112-2025-29-90-95.
Locke, John. 2016. Dva traktaty pro vriaduvannia [Two Treatises of Government]. Kyiv: Tempora.
Shevtsiv, Mykhailo. 2016. “Istoryko-filosofska refleksiia viiny” [“Historical and Philosophical Reflection on War”]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia yurydychna [Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Legal Series] 2: 96–104.
Shevtsov, O. V. 2021. “Viiskovo-teoretychni aspekty traktuvannia viiny na osnovi teorii Karla fon Klauzevitsa” [“Military-Theoretical Aspects of Interpreting War Based on Carl von Clausewitz’s Theory”]. Visnyk NA DPSU [Bulletin of the National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine] 3: 1–15.
Trebin, Mykhailo. 2024. “Kontseptsiia spravedlyvoi viiny” [“The Concept of Just War”]. In Filosofiia u suchasnomu sviti: materialy V Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii [Philosophy in the Modern World: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference], Kharkiv, November 22–24, 2024, 181–185. Kharkiv.
Fabre, Cécile. 2012. Cosmopolitan War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199551072.001.0001.
Frowe, Helen. 2011. The Ethics of War and Peace: An Introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203808404.
ICRC. 2024. “Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello.” Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross. https://www.icrc.org/en/ document/jus-ad-bellum-jus-in-bello.
McMahan, Jeff. 2009. Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199548668.001.0001.
Orend, Brian. 2006. The Morality of War. Peterborough: Broadview Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781551116698.
Walzer, Michael. 2015. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 5th ed. New York: Basic Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The scientific journal adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.
All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Copyright
Authors who publish their works in the journal:
-
retain the copyright to their publications;
-
grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;
-
agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;
-
have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.




