Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

General

1. A reviewer may be a member of the editorial board or an authorized expert in the field.
2. Reviewing is single-blind.
3. All correspondence between reviewer and author is performed across the editorial office.
4. A reviewer in its decision may be based on the opinions of experts involved them.
5. The result of a reviewer is recommendation.
6. The manuscript can be sent for review to several reviewers.
7. If author disagree with a reviewer comments he may send a reasoned response.
8. The decision of editorial board about article publishing is final.

Order of review

1. New manuscript is registered when its hard copy has been received by mail (registration date).
2. Editor-in-chief or executive editor choice a reviewer/s for the manuscript according to subject.
3. The manuscript send for review by the designated reviewer/s. Reviewing result — recommendation of reviewer.
4. Review for the manuscript send to the author in any way:
5. In case of positive review the manuscript passed to the editor to make a decision about publication.
6. In case of revision required the author receive all review comments and suggestions of reviewer.
7. In case of decline submission the author receive a review with a reasoned refusal.
8. The autor prepare necessary materials after receiving review:
9. a revised version of the manuscript in case of revision required (up to 3 months);
10. a reasoned answer if you disagree with a reviewer opinion.
11. Revised manuscript is sent to re-reviewing.
12. The manuscript, which received a positive review, is passed to the editorial office to prepare it for publication.