TYPOLOGY OF GRAPHIC SIGNS IN BRAND IDENTITY: TRANSFORMATIONS AND CHALLENGES OF THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2026.40.40Keywords:
graphic sign, logo, brand identity, logo typology, visual communication, identity design, symbol mark, wordmark, lettermark, combination mark, digital media, adaptive design, sign systems, brand communicationAbstract
In the system of contemporary visual communication, the logo is one of the key elements of brand identity, ensuring identification and differentiation of brands within a competitive information environment. The development of digital media and multichannel communication has led to the transformation of traditional approaches to graphic sign design and has brought the issue of their typology and functional adaptability to the forefront. Purpose. The article is devoted to the study of the typology of graphic signs in brand identity and the analysis of transformations of this typology in the context of digital communication development. The main purpose of the research is to identify the features of functioning of different types of logos in the contemporary media environment and to determine the tendencies toward their structural flexibility, variability, and interpenetration. Methodology. The methodological basis of the research includes general theoretical methods such as analysis, synthesis, and systematization, as well as comparative and typological approaches, which allow logos to be considered as elements of sign systems in visual communication. The study also employs elements of semiotic analysis for interpreting the graphic structure of signs, along with visual analysis of design solutions based on examples of well-known brands. Particular attention is given to the functioning of logos in digital interfaces and multimedia environments. Results. The article examines the main types of logos used in contemporary brand identity: wordmarks, lettermarks, symbol marks, abstract marks, combination marks, emblems, and mascot marks. Their structural features and functional capabilities within visual communication systems are analyzed. Special attention is paid to the conditional nature of boundaries between different typological categories and to the ability of logos to transition between categories depending on the context of use. Using examples of brands such as Apple and Esquire, the study demonstrates how logos change their form and functional role across different media environments. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the study lies in interpreting the typology of logos not as a static classification system, but as a dynamic structure that transforms under the influence of digital media. The study proposes an interpretation of the combination mark as a basic modular system of contemporary brand identity, capable of ensuring adaptability and variability in visual communication. Practical relevance. The results can be applied in the practice of brand identity design, particularly in the creation of logos intended to function across various digital and multimedia environments. The proposed approach to understanding logo typology may be useful for designers, researchers in visual communication, and educators in design disciplines.
References
Биченкова У., Кудінова Н., Соломадіна А. Знак. Українські товарні знаки 1960–1980-х років. Київ : ist publishing, 2022. 160 с.
Ейрі Д. Лого Дизайн Любов : посібник зі створення довершеної айдентики бренду. Київ : ArtHuss, 2024. 232 с.
Оганесян С. В., Колісник О. В. Знаково-символічні засоби візуальної ідентифікації бренду. Київ : КНУТД, 2024. 212 с.
Чемерис Г. Генеративний та динамічний дизайн як сучасний тренд брендингових концепцій. Дизайн, візуальне мистецтво та творчість: сучасні тенденції та технології : матеріали ІІ міжнар. наук.- практ. конф. Запоріжжя, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10372277
Albert-Vogl S. Brandscapes reimagined: Semiotic structures in branded virtual environments. Frontiers in Communication. 2026. Vol. 11. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1737058
Bradley S. Icon, index, and symbol – Three categories of signs. 2016. URL: https://vanseodesign.com/web-design/icon-index-symbol/
Buschgens M., Figueiredo B., Blijlevens J. Designing for identity: how and when brand visual aesthetics enable consumer diasporic identity. European Journal of Marketing. 2024. Vol. 58, No. 4. Pp. 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2022-0576
Deakin W. Three trends to drive 2025. Branding in Asia. 2024. URL: https://www.brandinginasia.com/three-trends-to-drive-2025-wayne-deakin-globalcreative-principal-at-wolff-olins/
Hübner P. What are Dynamic Brand Identities? URL: https://www.patrik-huebner.com/datadesigndictionary/dynamic-identities/
Liang L., Zainal Abidin S. B., Shaari N. B., Yahaya M. F. B., Jing L. Logo Impact on Consumer’s Perception, Attitude, Brand Image and Purchase Intention: A 5 Years Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 14(3). 2024. Vol. 14, No. 3. P. 861–900. URL: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i3/20084
Liu Y., Shmelova-Nesterenko O. Typological aspects of graphic signs in brand identity systems and their cultural-semiotic characteristics. Design Studies. 2025. Vol. 8, No. 3. URL: https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2025.3.4
Lu Y. Not Just a Sign: In what Ways can Semiotics be used to Contribute to Contemporary Rebranding Design? Highlights in Art and Design. 2025. Vol. 9, No. 2. P. 6–20. URL: https://doi.org/10.54097/5qn5e246
Martínez Sánchez M. E., Laureckis Molla M. E., Buil López-Menchero T. Visual Identity in the Digital Era: Decoding the Adaptation of Brands in the Digital Environment. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review. 2025. Vol. 17, No. 2. URL: https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.5771
Media Studies. Charles Peirce’s Sign Categories. URL: https://media-studies.com/peirce-signcategories/
Müller J., Remington R. Logo Modernism. Köln : Taschen, 2015. 432 p.
Neumeier M. The Brand Gap: How to Bridge the Distance Between Business Strategy and Design. 2nd ed. Indianapolis : New Riders, 2006. 208 p.
Norman D. A. The Design of Everyday Things. Rev. and expanded ed. New York : Basic Books, 2013. 368 p.
Olins W. On Brand. London : Thames & Hudson, 2003. 256 p.
Prasetyo A., Toni N. Linkedin Logo In Branding And Leadership: Semiotic Analysis In The Digital Era. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS). 2025. Vol. 5, No. 3. URL: https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v5i3.2053
Rand P. Design, Form, and Chaos. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1993. 240 p.
Rand P. Thoughts on Design. San Francisco : Chronicle Books, 2014. 96 p.
Remiel S. The return of minimalism in branding: Is less once again more? URL: https://www.phable.io/phable-labs/minimalism-in-branding-is-lessmore
Safronova A., Safronova O. Representing the national identity of Ukraine in graphic design. Scientific Journal of Polonia University. 2025. Vol. 71, № 4. P. 139–147. URL: https://doi.org/10.23856/7116
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Peirce’s semiotics. 2023. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/
Veloutsou C., Ballester E. A typology of brand knowledge associations projected in brand-generated signals. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2025. Vol. 34, No. 3. P. 376–397. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2024-5022
Wheeler A. Designing Brand Identity: An Essential Guide for the Whole Branding Team. 5th ed. Hoboken : John Wiley & Sons, 2017. 336 p.
White A. W. The Elements of Graphic Design. 2nd ed. New York : Allworth Press, 2011. 224 p.
Yuan P. A research on the dynamization effect of brand visual identity design: Mediated by digital information smart media. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management. 2024. Vol. 9, No. 1. Art. 24153. URL: https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.14078










