MODERN TRENDS IN THE FORMATION OF INCLUSIVENESS AND ACCESSIBILITY OF HISTORIC PUBLIC SPACES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2026.40.9Keywords:
inclusivity, public spaces, historic public spaces, accessibility, universal design, cognitive accessibility, digital inclusivity, cultural heritage, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, digital twins, urban environment, architectural and planning organizationAbstract
This study analyses current trends in the development of inclusive historic public spaces, characterized by a shift from ensuring physical accessibility to a comprehensive approach that incorporates cognitive and digital elements through the use of information and digital technologies. Purpose.The aim of this study is to summarize current trends in the development of inclusive and accessible historical public spaces and to identify the key principles of their architectural and planning organization. Methodology. The study employs a comprehensive approach, including an analysis of academic publications and regulatory documents from international organizations (UNESCO, ICOMOS, ISO), a comparative analysis of international practices in the organization of historical public spaces, as well as methods of systematization and generalization. Results. It has been established that modern requirements for historic public spaces call for a comprehensive approach to creating an inclusive environment, encompassing physical accessibility as well as cognitive and digital aspects of accessibility. The importance of using digital technologies and artificial intelligence, applied both at the research and design stages (BIM, GIS, digital twins) and during the operation of spaces through interactive services, navigation systems and personalized information solutions, has been substantiated. Scientific novelty. For the first time, a three-level model of inclusivity for historic public spaces is proposed, encompassing physical, cognitive and digital levels, the integration of which ensures comprehensive accessibility of the environment. The approach to understanding inclusiveness as a multidimensional category, combining spatial, informational and technological aspects of environmental organization, has been expanded. Practical relevance. The research findings can be utilized in the development of architectural and planning solutions for public spaces, in the processes of reconstructing the historical environment, and in the formulation of strategies for the post-war reconstruction of Ukrainian cities. The proposed approaches can be applied in regulatory and design practice to enhance the level of inclusivity and the quality of the urban environment. Keywords: inclusivity, public spaces, historic public spaces, accessibility, universal design, cognitive accessibility, digital inclusivity, cultural heritage, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, digital twins, urban environment, architectural and planning organization.
References
Гусєв М. Загальні принципи формування відкритих публічних просторів міст. Сучасні проблеми архітектури та містобудування. 2024. № 69. С. 3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2024.69.3-11
ДБН В.2.2-40:2018. Інклюзивність будівель і споруд. Основні положення. Київ: Мінрегіон України, 2018. URL: https://e-construction.gov.ua/laws_detail/3192362160978134152?doc_type=2
Здетовецька Н.О., Ковальська О.Є. Адаптація та збереження архітектурної спадщини: питання ефективного використання. Теорія та практика дизайну: зб. наук. праць. Архітектура та будівництво. 2023. Вип. 27. С. 49-56. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2023.27.6
Косяненко К., Куцевич В. Формування інклюзивного простору в історичному середовищі. Сучасні проблеми архітектури та містобудування. 2025. Вип.74. с. 393–404. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2025.74.393-404
Куцевич В. В. Питання формування містобудівних умов при реставрації історичних сакральних будівель і споруд. Досвід та перспективи розвитку міст України: зб. наук. праць. 2016. № 31. С. 52–58.
Куцевич В. В. та ін. Теоретичні та практичні основи реставрації / за ред. В. В. Куцевича. Чернівці: ЧНУ ім. Ю. Федьковича, 2024. 224 С. URL: https://files. znu.edu.ua/files/Bibliobooks/Inshi78/0058177.pdf
Лещенко Н. А. Методи комплексного процесу реставраційно-реконструктивних перетворень. Сучасні проблеми архітектури та містобудування. 2021. Вип. 61 С. 80–93. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2021.61.80-93
Олійник, О. Відкритий міський простір як об’єкт культурної спадщини: методи виявлення та збереження. Сучасні проблеми Архітектури та Містобудування. 2020. Вип. 58. С.178–191. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2020.58.178-191
Олійник О. П. Просторові трансформації історичних центрів міст: дис. … д-ра архітектури: 18.00.01. Київ: КНУБА, 2021. 428 с.
Соснова Н. С. Теоретичні основи і методи організації громадського простору в історичних містах: дис.… д-ра архітектури: 18.00.01. Львів: ЛНАМ, 2021. 432 с.
Chen D., Wang R., Xiao Y. Enhancing cultural heritage accessibility through spatial analysis. Journal of Urban Design. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2607901
Flego C., Tei A. Boosting accessibility and inclusiveness in tourism and cultural heritage sites: benchmarking best practices. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-11-2023-0193
Gupta A., Yadav M., Nayak B. K. A systematic literature review on inclusive public open spaces: Accessibility standards and universal design principles. Urban Science. 2025. Vol. 9. No. 6. Art. 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9060181
ICOMOS. Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Québec: ICOMOS, 2008. URL: https://www.icomos.org/charters/interpretation_e.pdf
ISO 21542:2021. Building construction – Accessibility and usability of the built environment. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 2021. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/50498.html
Rebernik N., Goličnik Marušić B., Bahillo A., Osaba E. A 4-dimensional model and combined methodological approach to inclusive urban planning and design for all. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019. Vol. 44. P. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.001
Flego C., Tei A. Boosting accessibility and inclusiveness in tourism and cultural heritage sites: benchmarking best-practices. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. 2026. Vol. 16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-11-2023-0193
Serrano-Estrada L., Martí P., Bernabeu-Bautista Á., Huskinson M. Mapping heritage engagement in historic centres through social media insights and accessibility analysis. Land. 2024. Vol. 13. № 12. Article 1972. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13121972
The Center for Universal Design. The principles of universal design (Version 2.0). Raleigh. NC: North Carolina State University. 1997. URL: https://design.ncsu.edu/research/center-for-universal-design
UNESCO. Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO. 2017. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
UNESCO. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. Paris: UNESCO, 2011. URL: https://w h c . u n e s c o. o r g / u p l o a d s / a c t i v i t i e s / d o c u m e n t s / activity-638-98.pdf
United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. 2015. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: adopted by the UN General Assembly on 13 December 2006. New York: United Nations, 2006. URL: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf










