ADAPTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION OF RTCT VERIFICATION IN DECENTRALIZED OVERLAY NETWORKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.71.21453Keywords:
cybersecurity, Sybil, RTCT, overlay, optimization, ККТ, adaptivityAbstract
Decentralized overlay networks – peer-to-peer systems, Internet-of-Things infrastructures, mesh and MANET environments, and the peer layer of Web3 ecosystems – operate without a single coordination center or trusted certification authority, which makes guaranteed verification of participant uniqueness impossible and opens the way to the Sybil attack and its derivatives: distributed-storage table poisoning, node eclipsing, artificial reputation inflation, and retention of an advantageous routing position. The mechanism of random time challenge tokens (RTCT) shifts protection from one-off admission control to participation-retention control; however, its practical suitability is determined by the choice of verification parameters – puzzle difficulty, challenge intensity, and response-window width. Baseline deterministic difficulty-adjustment schemes control a single parameter, react only to aggregate timing deviation, and are insensitive to the hardware heterogeneity of nodes. This article improves the method of adaptive tuning of participation-control parameters: the approach moves from adjusting difficulty alone to analytical multi-criteria optimization of the RTCT verification triple under the criteria of attack resistance and the computational and communication overhead of honest nodes. The problem is scalarized by a weighted sum whose weights parameterize the Pareto frontier. The optimum is characterized by the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions under the assumptions of concavity of the security index and convexity of the overhead functions, which guarantees a unique global solution independent of the search algorithm. Analysis of the first-order conditions yields a meaningful tuning principle: the response window is tightened only as far as the honest-node false-positive budget permits, while intensity and difficulty are set by equalizing the marginal gain in resistance per unit of overhead. The linear scaling of the adversary’s resources with the number of fake identities is justified by queueing theory. A model illustrative example demonstrates the interior optimum and its comparative statics, consistent with the requirements of adaptivity. For non-stationary regimes, an optional realization of parameter selection as a Markov decision process solved by reinforcement learning is outlined, which is built on top of the analytical optimum and does not weaken the provability of the guarantees.
References
[1] Douceur J. R. The Sybil Attack. Peer-to-Peer Systems : IPTPS 2002 / eds. P. Druschel, F. Kaashoek, A. Rowstron. Berlin ; Heidelberg : Springer, 2002. P. 251–260. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; vol. 2429). DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24.
[2] Пархоменко І. І., Огієвич Р. В. Криптоеконо-мічна стійкість децентралізованої мережі з використанням випадкових часових челендж-токенів (RTCT). Кібербезпека: освіта, наука, техніка. 2025. № 4 (28). С. 465–477. DOI: 10.28925/2663-4023.2025.28.817.
[3] Dwork C., Naor M. Pricing via Processing or Combatting Junk Mail. Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO ’92 / ed. E. F. Brickell. Berlin ; Heidelberg : Springer, 1993. P. 139–147. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; vol. 740). DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48071-4_10.
[4] Li F., Mittal P., Caesar M., Borisov N. SybilControl: Practical Sybil Defense with Computational Puzzles. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Workshop on Scalable Trusted Computing (STC ’12). New York : ACM, 2012. P. 67–78. DOI: 10.1145/2382536.2382548.
[5] Budish E. Trust at Scale: The Economic Limits of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2025. Vol. 140, No. 1. P. 1–62. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjae033.
[6] Boneh D., Bonneau J., Bünz B., Fisch B. Verifiable Delay Functions. Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2018 / eds. H. Shacham, A. Boldyreva. Cham : Springer, 2018. P. 757–788. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 10991). DOI: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-96884-1_25.
[7] Percival C. Stronger Key Derivation via Sequential Memory-Hard Functions : BSDCan 2009. Ottawa, 2009. 16 p.
[8] Biryukov A., Dinu D., Khovratovich D. Argon2: New Generation of Memory-Hard Functions for Password Hashing and Other Applications. 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). Saarbrücken : IEEE, 2016. P. 292–302. DOI: 10.1109/EuroSP.2016.31.
[9] Lamport L. Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System. Communications of the ACM. 1978. Vol. 21, No. 7. P. 558–565. DOI: 10.1145/359545.359563.
[10] Lee S., Bak Y. Looking for Attention: Randomized Attention Test Design for Validator Monitoring in Optimistic Rollups : preprint. 2025. arXiv:2505. 24393.
[11] Cho J.-H., Sharma D. P., Alavizadeh H. et al. Toward Proactive, Adaptive Defense: A Survey on Moving Target Defense. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2020. Vol. 22, No. 1. P. 709–745. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2019.2963791.
[12] Sengupta S., Chowdhary A., Sabur A. et al. A Survey of Moving Target Defenses for Network Security. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2020. Vol. 22, No. 3. P. 1909–1941. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2020.2982955.
[13] Sutton R. S., Barto A. G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2018. 552 p.
[14] Nguyen T. T., Reddi V. J. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Security. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2023. Vol. 34, No. 8. P. 3779–3795. DOI: 10.1109/ TNNLS.2021.3121870.
[15] Mukherjee A., Kumar V., Jorswieck E. A. et al. On the Optimality of the Stationary Solution of Secrecy Rate Maximization for MIMO Wiretap Channel. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters. 2022. Vol. 11, No. 2. P. 357–361. DOI: 10.1109/ LWC.2021.3128331.
[16] Noda S., Okumura K., Hashimoto Y. An Economic Analysis of Difficulty Adjustment Algorithms in Proof-of-Work Blockchain Systems. International Economic Review. 2026. Vol. 67, No. 1. P. 259–285. DOI: 10.1111/iere.70028.
[17] Halfin S., Whitt W. Heavy-Traffic Limits for Queues with Many Exponential Servers. Operations Research. 1981. Vol. 29, No. 3. P. 567–588. DOI: 10.1287/opre.29.3.567.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Р Огієвич

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The scientific journal adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.
All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Copyright
Authors who publish their works in the journal:
-
retain the copyright to their publications;
-
grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;
-
agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;
-
have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.



