ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF SPHERICAL STATIONARY AVIATION OXYGEN CYLINDERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/0370-2197.3(112).21619

Keywords:

composite materials, strength, liner, cylinder classification, aviation systems, design, mechanical properties

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the requirements of industry standard OST 1 03749-74 for stationary spherical aviation cylinders with a capacity of 2–25 liters, designed for an operating pressure of 21 MPa (210 kgf/cm²), intended for storing medical and technical oxygen on board an aircraft, and the international standard ISO 11119-1, which regulates the design, manufacture, and testing of Type 2 refillable composite cylinders with annular fiber wrapping around a metal liner. The objective of this work is to identify the differences between the design schemes of Types 1 and 2 and to justify directions for improving the spherical steel oxygen cylinder. The comparison was conducted using a normative and technical analysis based on criteria such as design scheme, materials, strength calculations, testing, cyclic durability, reliability, service life, and external factors. It was established that OST 1 03749-74 provides for the load to be borne by a solid steel wall and for its strength to be specified based on absolute mechanical characteristics, whereas ISO 11119-1 is based on load distribution between a metal liner and a composite shell, with evaluation based on the criterion of stress in the fiber. The requirements for oxygen equipment are analyzed in detail separately, specifically regarding the degreasing of the internal cavity, protective coatings, and the compatibility of materials with an oxidizing environment. It is shown that linerless composite structures of types 4–5 are not intended for oxidizing gases, whereas type 2 retains a metal barrier between the oxygen and the composite material. Based on a comparison of regulatory requirements and the results of research on metal-composite cylinders, the feasibility of forming a composite shell on a steel liner without changing the operating pressure has been demonstrated. This allows for the redistribution of hoop stresses onto the composite shell and reduces the overall weight of the structure by 15–30% while maintaining strength, safety, and oxygen compatibility.

Author Biography

Kateryna Chava, National University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”

PhD student in the specialty G9 “Applied Mechanics” at the Department of Applied Mechanics and Materials Engineering, National University “Kyiv Aviation Institute”, 1 Lyubomyr Huzar Ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

References

1. OST 1 03749-74. 1974. 7 p.

2. International Organization for Standardization. (2020). Gas cylinders – Design, construction and testing of refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes – Part 1: Hoop wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l (ISO Standard No. ISO 11119-1:2020).

3. International Organization for Standardization. (2020). Gas cylinders – Design, construction and testing of refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes – Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners (ISO Standard No. ISO 11119-2:2020).

4. International Organization for Standardization. (2020). Gas cylinders – Design, construction and testing of refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes – Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners or without liners (ISO Standard No. ISO 11119-3:2020).

5. Eko, A. J., Epaarachchi, J., Jewewantha, J., & Zeng, X. (2025). A review of type IV composite overwrapped pressure vessels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 109, 551-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.108

6. Rahul, B., Chand, D. S., & Dharani, J. (2022). A comprehensive review on the performance analysis of composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 49(2), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2022.29

7. Air, A., Shamsuddoha, M., & Gangadhara Prusty, B. (2023). A review of Type V composite pressure vessels and automated fibre placement based manufacturing. Composites Part B: Engineering, 253, Article 110573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110573

8. Mirzaei, J., Nouri Niyaraki, M., & Zarei, H. R. (2023). Design and experimental/numerical analysis of metal-composite vessel with spherical cap under internal pressure. Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures, 10(2), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.22075/macs.2022.28318.1432

9. Amraee Rad, G., & Rahimi, G. (2021). Design and analysis of metal-composite vessel under internal pressure. International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology, 14(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30495/admt.2021.1918180.1234

10. Bouhala, L., Karatrantos, A., Reinhardt, H., Schramm, N., Akin, B., Rauscher, A., Mauersberger, A., Taşkıran, S. T., Ulaşlı, M. E., Aktaş, E., & Tanoğlu, M. (2024). Advancement in the modeling and design of composite pressure vessels for hydrogen storage: a comprehensive review. Journal of Composites Science, 8(9), Article 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090339

Published

2026-10-18

How to Cite

Chava, K. (2026). ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS FOR THE DESIGN OF SPHERICAL STATIONARY AVIATION OXYGEN CYLINDERS. Problems of Friction and Wear, (3(112), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.18372/0370-2197.3(112).21619

Issue

Section

Проблеми тертя та зношування