Spatial-resolution Robustness of CT-Based Vertebral Fragility Screening in Potentially War-affected Individuals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.89.21469

Keywords:

machine learning, computed tomography, image degradation, vertebral fragility, domain shift, radiomics, potentially war-affected populations, opportunistic screening

Abstract

The paper is devoted to preserving the accuracy of machine-learning models for computed tomography based vertebral fragility screening under degraded image acquisition, typical of mobile and field-deployed scanners in war-affected regions. The paper proposes a paired evaluation protocol, in which a model trained on clean features is applied twice to the same held-out vertebrae, which is based on controlled synthetic degradation of the same computed tomography volumes: additive noise (15, 30, 50 HU), in-plane Gaussian blur (σ = 0.5, 1, 2 mm) and slice-thickness coarsening (2, 3, 5, 7 mm). The paper develops a comparative assessment of four imaging representations of vertebral bone on two independent cohorts (106 patients, 478 vertebrae and 126 patients, 589 vertebrae), the paired difference of the area under the ROC curve being estimated by a patient-clustered bootstrap. Additive noise produced no dose-consistent effect. In-plane blur reduced the area under the curve of the radiomics representation by 0.096 (95 % CI –0.165, –0.025) and 0.112 (–0.169, –0.053) in the two cohorts, whereas the mean-attenuation representation stayed within the null interval at every condition (0.732 and 0.665 on clean data). The results of the work can be used to select acquisition-robust imaging biomarkers for opportunistic screening of war-affected and displaced individuals, whose mean age matches that of the cohorts studied and who are scanned wherever equipment is available.

Author Biographies

Victor Sineglazov , National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Engineering Science

Professor

Department of Artificial Intelligence

Institute of Applied Systems Analysis

Kirill Riazanovskiy , National Technical University of Ukraine “Ihor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Assistant

Artificial Intelligence Department

Educational and Scientific Institute of Applied System Analysis

Dāvids Orlovs , Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital

Resident in Radiology

Department of Radiology

Faculty of Medicine

Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte (RSU)

Jekaterina Stepanova , Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte (RSU)

Student (Master’s programme)

Department of Radiology

Faculty of Medicine

Ardis Platkajis , Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital

Doctor of Medicine (Dr. med.)

Professor

Head of the Department of Radiology

Faculty of Medicine, Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte (RSU) 

References

P. J. Pickhardt et al., “Automated abdominal CT imaging biomarkers for opportunistic prediction of future major osteoporotic fractures in asymptomatic adults,” Radiology, vol. 297, pp. 64–72, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200466.

[2] S. J. Lee and P. J. Pickhardt, “Future osteoporotic fracture risk related to lumbar vertebral trabecular attenuation at routine body CT,” J. Bone Miner. Res., vol. 33, pp. 860–867, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3383.

[3] U. J. Muehlematter et al., “Vertebral body insufficiency fractures: detection of vertebrae at risk on standard CT images using texture analysis and machine learning,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 29, pp. 2207–2217, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5846-8.

[4] S. H. Kong et al., “A CT-based fracture prediction model with images of vertebral bones and muscles by employing deep learning,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, e48535, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2196/48535.

[5] J. Wasserthal et al., “TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images,” Radiol. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, e230024, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230024.

[6] A. Traverso, L. Wee, A. Dekker, and R. Gillies, “Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 102, pp. 1143–1158, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.053.

[7] A. Zwanenburg, M. Vallières, M. A. Abdalah et al., “The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping,” Radiology, vol. 295, pp. 328–338, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191145.

[8] K. Riazanovskiy, D. Orlovs, J. Stepanova, V. Sineglazov, A. Platkajis, and O. Chumachenko, “Per-vertebra prediction of future osteoporotic fractures from routine computed tomography using a two-stage machine learning framework,” Medicina, vol. 62, no. 8, 1518 p., 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62081518.

[9] A. Vabalas et al., “Machine-learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size,” PLoS One, vol. 14, e0224365, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224365.

[10] S. Saradzhyan, “Average Age of Ukrainian Soldiers Is Past 40 and That Could Be a Problem,” Russia Matters, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, 3 Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.russiamatters.org/blog/average-age-ukrainian-soldiers-past-40-and-could-be-problem

[11] “Average age of Ukrainian military is 43–45 years old, there is problem with mobilisation of young people – Bloomberg,” LB.ua, 27 May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://en.lb.ua/news/2024/05/27/29492_average_age_ukrainian_military.html

[12] A. Evych and M. Fal, “One Foot in Retirement: Serving Over 50,” Frontliner, 13 Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://frontliner.ua/en/one-foot-in-retirement-serving-over-50/

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

Sineglazov , V., Riazanovskiy , K., Orlovs , D., Stepanova , J., & Platkajis , A. (2026). Spatial-resolution Robustness of CT-Based Vertebral Fragility Screening in Potentially War-affected Individuals. Electronics and Control Systems, 3(89), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.89.21469

Issue

Section

COMPUTER SCIENCE