Spatial-resolution Robustness of CT-Based Vertebral Fragility Screening in Potentially War-affected Individuals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.89.21469Keywords:
machine learning, computed tomography, image degradation, vertebral fragility, domain shift, radiomics, potentially war-affected populations, opportunistic screeningAbstract
The paper is devoted to preserving the accuracy of machine-learning models for computed tomography based vertebral fragility screening under degraded image acquisition, typical of mobile and field-deployed scanners in war-affected regions. The paper proposes a paired evaluation protocol, in which a model trained on clean features is applied twice to the same held-out vertebrae, which is based on controlled synthetic degradation of the same computed tomography volumes: additive noise (15, 30, 50 HU), in-plane Gaussian blur (σ = 0.5, 1, 2 mm) and slice-thickness coarsening (2, 3, 5, 7 mm). The paper develops a comparative assessment of four imaging representations of vertebral bone on two independent cohorts (106 patients, 478 vertebrae and 126 patients, 589 vertebrae), the paired difference of the area under the ROC curve being estimated by a patient-clustered bootstrap. Additive noise produced no dose-consistent effect. In-plane blur reduced the area under the curve of the radiomics representation by 0.096 (95 % CI –0.165, –0.025) and 0.112 (–0.169, –0.053) in the two cohorts, whereas the mean-attenuation representation stayed within the null interval at every condition (0.732 and 0.665 on clean data). The results of the work can be used to select acquisition-robust imaging biomarkers for opportunistic screening of war-affected and displaced individuals, whose mean age matches that of the cohorts studied and who are scanned wherever equipment is available.
References
P. J. Pickhardt et al., “Automated abdominal CT imaging biomarkers for opportunistic prediction of future major osteoporotic fractures in asymptomatic adults,” Radiology, vol. 297, pp. 64–72, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200466.
[2] S. J. Lee and P. J. Pickhardt, “Future osteoporotic fracture risk related to lumbar vertebral trabecular attenuation at routine body CT,” J. Bone Miner. Res., vol. 33, pp. 860–867, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3383.
[3] U. J. Muehlematter et al., “Vertebral body insufficiency fractures: detection of vertebrae at risk on standard CT images using texture analysis and machine learning,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 29, pp. 2207–2217, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5846-8.
[4] S. H. Kong et al., “A CT-based fracture prediction model with images of vertebral bones and muscles by employing deep learning,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, e48535, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2196/48535.
[5] J. Wasserthal et al., “TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images,” Radiol. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, e230024, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230024.
[6] A. Traverso, L. Wee, A. Dekker, and R. Gillies, “Repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features: a systematic review,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 102, pp. 1143–1158, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.053.
[7] A. Zwanenburg, M. Vallières, M. A. Abdalah et al., “The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping,” Radiology, vol. 295, pp. 328–338, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191145.
[8] K. Riazanovskiy, D. Orlovs, J. Stepanova, V. Sineglazov, A. Platkajis, and O. Chumachenko, “Per-vertebra prediction of future osteoporotic fractures from routine computed tomography using a two-stage machine learning framework,” Medicina, vol. 62, no. 8, 1518 p., 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62081518.
[9] A. Vabalas et al., “Machine-learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size,” PLoS One, vol. 14, e0224365, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224365.
[10] S. Saradzhyan, “Average Age of Ukrainian Soldiers Is Past 40 and That Could Be a Problem,” Russia Matters, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, 3 Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.russiamatters.org/blog/average-age-ukrainian-soldiers-past-40-and-could-be-problem
[11] “Average age of Ukrainian military is 43–45 years old, there is problem with mobilisation of young people – Bloomberg,” LB.ua, 27 May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://en.lb.ua/news/2024/05/27/29492_average_age_ukrainian_military.html
[12] A. Evych and M. Fal, “One Foot in Retirement: Serving Over 50,” Frontliner, 13 Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://frontliner.ua/en/one-foot-in-retirement-serving-over-50/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The scientific journal “Electronics and control systems” adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.
All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Copyright
Authors who publish their works in the journal “Electronics and control systems”:
-
retain the copyright to their publications;
-
grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;
-
agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;
-
have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.



