Peer Review Process

1. All articles undergo three stages of review:
   1st stage – for compliance with requirements of the journal
   2nd stage – checking for plagiarism
   3rd stage – a double-blind review
2. The reviewer may be a member of the editorial board or authorized expert in information security.
3. Chief Editor and Executive Secretary appointed reviewers.
4. Blind review suggests that neither the author nor the reviewer knows the names of each other, all correspondence between the author and the reviewers conducted by editors.
5. Results after consideration of articles submitted to the editorial board (report specifically approved by the chief editor of the form).
6. Reviewer Report is a recommendation, the final decision on the publication of articles The editorial board.
7. The author can not agree with the opinion of the reviewer and the editor to send a reasoned response.
8. If necessary, the author sent the comments and term which accepted corrections.
9. In the event of a negative review of the manuscript the author sent a reasoned review of the refusal.