DIGITALIZATION IN THE FOCUS OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURE AND ART: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND CULTURAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.1.21245

Keywords:

digital art, cyberart, virtual culture, artificial intelligence, creativity, digitalization, originality, authorship, aura, simulacrum

Abstract

Introduction. The article analyzes the transformation of originality and authorship in art under conditions of digitalization. Particular attention is paid to changes in the ontological status of the artwork in immersive and interactive digital environments. The aim and tasks. The aim of the article is to analyze the transformation of the ontological status of the original artwork, to examine the critical potential of Walter Benjamin’s concept of the “aura” in the context of digital art, and to identify new forms of viewer-artwork interaction in immersive digital environments. Research methods. The research methodology combines hermeneutic analysis, comparative method, and case study analysis based on the TeamLab Borderless museum (Japan). The theoretical framework includes Walter Benjamin’s concept of the “aura,” Jean Baudrillard’s theory of simulacra, and Paul Virilio’s analysis of the crisis of perception. Research results. The study demonstrates that under conditions of digital reproduction the value of an artwork shifts from the uniqueness of the physical object to the uniqueness of the concept and interaction process. In immersive digital art, the viewer becomes a participant in the artistic event rather than a passive observer. The analysis of TeamLab Borderless confirms that each interaction with a digital installation acquires a unique processual character, even when the technical basis of the artwork remains unchanged. At the same time, digital artworks reveal ontological vulnerability because their existence depends entirely on technological infrastructure. Discussion. The obtained results make it possible to reconsider Benjamin’s concept of the “aura” in the context of digital culture. Unlike approaches that interpret digital reproduction exclusively as the loss of authenticity, the study argues that uniqueness increasingly manifests itself through interactive and processual forms of artistic experience. These conclusions partly confirm and extend Baudrillard’s interpretation of simulation in contemporary culture. Conclusions. Contemporary digital art transforms traditional concepts of originality, authorship, and artistic presence. In immersive environments, the uniqueness of the artwork is increasingly connected not with material singularity but with the unrepeatable character of interaction. This creates the need for new philosophical and cultural criteria capable of distinguishing artistic communication from simulacral forms of digital reproduction.

Author Biographies

Maksym Melnychuk, National University of Water and Environmental Management (Rivne)

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies

Oleh Sokolovskyi, Ivan Franko State University of Zhytomyr

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Political Science

References

Список літератури

Антіпова О. П. Візуальна комунікація як атрибут цифрової культури. Вісник Національного авіаційного університету. Серія: Філософія. Культурологія. 2023. № 2 (38). С. 66–70. 10.18372/2412-2157.2.18115.

Антіпова О. П. Комунікативні характеристики сучасної культурної доби в контексті цифровізації. Вісник Національного авіаційного університету. Серія: Філософія. Культурологія. 2021. № 2 (34). С. 95–98. 10.18372/2412-2157.34.16336.

Воронкова В. Г. Філософія цифрової людини і цифрового суспільства: теорія і практика : монографія. Львів-Торунь : Liha-Pres, 2022. 460 с.

Денисюк Ж. З., Яковлев О. В. Формування інформаційної культури суспільства в умовах цифровізації. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2021. № 2. С. 18–22. 10.32461/2226-3209.2.2021.239802.

Дротенко В. І. Феномен візуальності з погляду концепту єдності когнітивного та емоційного інтелекту. Scientific Goals and Purposes in XXI Century. 2022. № 95. С. 478–484. 10.51582/interconf.19-20.01.2022.049.

Луговський О. В. Цифрова культура і її невід'ємне місце в сучасному інформаційному суспільстві. Філософські обрії. 2019. № 42. С. 219–223.

Малежик Ю. М. Цифровий живопис як альтернатива академічному у дистанційній підготовці фахівців образотворчого мистецтва. Мистецька освіта у міждисциплінарному вимірі : матеріали Всеукр. наук.-практ. конф. (Харків, 07–08 черв. 2022 р.). Харків : ХНПУ імені Г. С. Сковороди, 2022. С. 62–66.

Осадча К. П., Балута В. С. Вплив сучасних тенденцій цифрового мистецтва на зміст підготовки з комп'ютерної графіки та цифрового дизайну. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology. 2021. № 9 (1). С. 1–12. 10.32919/uesit.2021.01.01.

Сарнавська О. В., Яковишина Т. В., Шадюк Т. А. Філософське осмислення особистості цифрового покоління: постмодерний дискурс. Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка. Філософські науки. 2020. Вип. 2 (88). С. 135–145. 10.35433/PhilosophicalSciences.2 (88).2020.135-145.

Совгира Т. І. Цифрові технології в сучасному візуальному мистецтві. Вісник КНУКіМ. Серія «Мистецтвознавство». 2020. № 42. С. 65–71. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1176.42.2020.207634

Baudrillard J. The Conspiracy of Art: Manifestos, Interviews, Essays. New York : Autonomedia, 2015. 248 p.

Benjamin W. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London : Penguin Great Ideas, 2013. 128 p.

Du W., Li Z., Gao Q. Analysis of the interaction between digital art and traditional art. International Conference on Networking and Digital Society. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 441–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNDS.2010.5479462.

McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2014. 365 p.

Metelenko N., Vasylchuk G., Kaganov Y., Nikitenko V., Voronkova V. Digital cultural development under new threats and challenges. Humanities Studies: Collection of Scientific Papers. 2023. Vol. 15 (92). P. 33–43. 10.32782/hst-2023-15-92-04.

Serres M. Variations on the Body / translated by R. Burks. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 2011. 152 p.

teamLab Borderless: MORI Building DIGITAL ART MUSEUM [Електронний ресурс]. teamLab. URL: https://www.teamlab.art/e/tokyo/ (дата звернення: 14.03.2026).

Virilio P. The Vision Machine. Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 2011. 152 p.

Weiming D., Zhongyang L., Qian G. Analysis of the interaction between digital art and traditional art. International Conference on Networking and Digital Society. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 441–443. https://doi.org/10. 1109/ ICNDS.2010.5479462.

Zabora V., Kasianenko K., Pashukova S., Alforova Z., Shmehelska Yu. Digital art in designing an artistic image. Amazonia Investiga. 2023. № 12 (64). P. 300–305. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.31.

References

Antipova, Olha. 2023. “Vizualna komunikatsiia yak atrybut tsyfrovoi kultury” [Visual Communication as an Attribute of Digital Culture]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia [Proceedings of the National Aviation University. Series: Philosophy. Cultural Studies] 2 (38): 66–70. https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.2.18115.

Antipova, Olha. 2021. “Komunikatyvni kharakterystyky suchasnoi kulturnoi doby v konteksti tsyfrovizatsii” [Communicative Characteristics of the Modern Cultural Era in the Context of Digitalization]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia [Proceedings of the National Aviation University. Series: Philosophy. Cultural Studies] 2 (34): 95–98. https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.34.16336.

Voronkova, Valentyna. 2022. Filosofiia tsyfrovoi liudyny i tsyfrovoho suspilstva: teoriia i praktyka [Philosophy of the Digital Person and Digital Society: Theory and Practice]. Lviv-Torun: Liha-Pres.

Denysiuk, Zhanna, and Oleksandr Yakovlev. 2021. “Formuvannia informatsiinoi kultury suspilstva v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii” [Formation of the Information Culture of Society under Conditions of Digitalization]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv [National Academy of Culture and Arts Management Herald] 2: 18–22. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2021.239802.

Drotenko, Valentyna. 2022. “Fenomen vizualnosti z pohliadu kontseptu yednosti kohnityvnoho ta emotsiinoho intelektu” [The Phenomenon of Visuality from the Perspective of the Concept of the Unity of Cognitive and Emotional Intelligence]. Scientific Goals and Purposes in XXI Century 95: 478–484. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.01.2022.049.

Luhovskyi, Oleksandr. 2019. “Tsyfrova kultura i yii nevidiemne mistse v suchasnomu informatsiinomu suspilstvi” [Digital Culture and Its Integral Place in Contemporary Information Society]. Filosofski obrii [Philosophical Horizons] 42: 219–223.

Malezhyk, Yurii. 2022. “Tsyfrovyi zhyvopys yak alternatyva akademichnomu u dystantsiinii pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva” [Digital Painting as an Alternative to Academic Painting in Distance Training of Fine Arts Specialists]. In Mystetska osvita u mizhdystsyplinarnomu vymiri [Art Education in the Interdisciplinary Dimension], 62–66. Kharkiv: KhNPU imeni H. S. Skovorody.

Osadcha, Kateryna, and Valentyn Baluta. 2021. “Vplyv suchasnykh tendentsii tsyfrovoho mystetstva na zmist pidhotovky z kompiuternoi hrafiky ta tsyfrovoho dyzainu” [The Influence of Modern Trends in Digital Art on the Content of Training in Computer Graphics and Digital Design]. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology 9 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32919/uesit.2021.01.01.

Sarnavska, Oksana, Tetiana Yakovyshyna, and Tamara Shadiuk. 2020. “Filosofske osmyslennia osobystosti tsyfrovoho pokolinnia: postmodernyi dyskurs” [Philosophical Understanding of the Personality of the Digital Generation: Postmodern Discourse]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Filosofski nauky [Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences] 2 (88): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.35433/ PhilosophicalSciences.2(88).2020.135-145.

Sovhyra, Tetiana. 2020. “Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii v suchasnomu vizualnomu mystetstvi” [Digital Technologies in Contemporary Visual Art]. Visnyk KNUKiM. Seriia: Mystetstvoznavstvo [Bulletin of KNUKiM. Series: Art Studies] 42: 65–71. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1176.42.2020. 207634.

Baudrillard, Jean. 2015. The Conspiracy of Art: Manifestos, Interviews, Essays. New York: Autonomedia.

Benjamin, Walter. 2013. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London: Penguin Great Ideas.

Du, Weiming, Zhongyang Li, and Qian Gao. 2011. “Analysis of the Interaction between Digital Art and Traditional Art.” International Conference on Networking and Digital Society 2: 441–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNDS. 2010.5479462.

McLuhan, Marshall. 2014. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Metelenko, Natalia, Hennadii Vasylchuk, Yurii Kahanov, Vitalina Nikitenko, and Valentyna Voronkova. 2023. “Digital Cultural Development under New Threats and Challenges.” Humanities Studies: Collection of Scientific Papers 15 (92): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.32782/hst-2023-15-92-04.

Serres, Michel. 2011. Variations on the Body. Translated by Randolph Burks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

teamLab. n.d. “teamLab Borderless: MORI Building DIGITAL ART MUSEUM.” Accessed March 14, 2026. https://www.teamlab.art/e/tokyo/.

Virilio, Paul. 2011. The Vision Machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Zabora, Volodymyr, Karolina Kasianenko, Svitlana Pashukova, Zoya Alforova, and Yuliia Shmehelska. 2023. “Digital Art in Designing an Artistic Image.” Amazonia Investiga 12 (64): 300–305. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/ 2023.64.04.31

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Melnychuk, M., & Sokolovskyi, O. (2026). DIGITALIZATION IN THE FOCUS OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURE AND ART: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND CULTURAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVE. Proceedings of the Kyiv Aviation Institute. Series: Philosophy. Cultural, 1(43), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.1.21245