Conceptual content of the legal integration: contemporary discussions and the way of constructive dia-logue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.30.8495Keywords:
legal integration, unification of law, harmonization of law, comparative legal method, justification of lawAbstract
The modern political integrative processes involve the correspondent integration in sphere of legal regulation. But one of the essential problems in this respect is the disagreement about the conceptual content of the legal integration, as well as about the approaches to its realization. Thus, the analysis of the ways of this problem’s solving is the main subject of proposed article. Integration that has covered almost all aspects of life in the modern world has become fundamental factor in review of established ideas about targets, functionalities and mechanisms of the legal regulation. The purpose of the article. Analysis of the contemporary discussions about the content of the concept of "legal integration" in order to determine the most constructive directions for optimization regulation in the integrated political and legal space.
References
Зиновьев А. Глобализация как символическая борьба и вызов для политической науки / А.Зиновьев // Антиглобализм и глобальное управление: Доклады, дискуссии, справочные материалы. – М. : МГИМО(У) МИД России, 2006. – С. 51-60.
Золотухин И. Человек в эпоху глобализации. Парадигмы развития / И.Золотухин // Антиглобализм и глобальное управление: Доклады, дискуссии, справочные материалы. – М. : МГИМО(У) МИД России, 2006. – С. 61-66.
Рабель Э. Задачи и необходимость сравнительного правоведения / Эрнст Рабель. – Екатеринбург: Российская школа частного права (Уральское отделение), 2000. – 48 с.
Удовика Л. Г. Трансформація правової системи в умовах глобалізації: антропологічний вимір / Л. Г.Удовика. – Х. : Право, 2011. – 552 с.
Цвайгерт К. Введение в сравнительное правоведение в сфере частного права: в 2-х томах / К. Цвайгерт, Х. Кётц. – Т.1. Основы; пер. с нем. – М. : Международные отношения, 2000. – 480 с.
Brand O. Conceptual comparisons: towards a coherent methodology of comparative legal studies / O. Brand // Brooklyn Journal of International Law. – 2006-2007. – Vol. 32. – P. 405-466.
Jameson F. Notes of globalization as a philosophical issue / F.Jameson // Globalization. Critical Concept in Sociology / R. Robertson and K.E.White (eds.). – Vol.1. – L., 2003. – P. 309-328.
Legrand P. European legal systems are not converging / P. Legrand // International and Com-parative Law Quarterly. – 1996. – Vol. 45. – № 1. – P. 52-81.
Van Hoecke M. Legal cultures, legal paradigms and legal doctrine: towards a new model for comparative law / M. Van Hoecke, M.Warrington // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. – 1998. – Vol. 47. – № 4. – P. 495-536.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The scientific journal adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.
All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Copyright
Authors who publish their works in the journal:
-
retain the copyright to their publications;
-
grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;
-
agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;
-
have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.




