Nanodevices with Majority Structures

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.88.20977

Keywords:

micro- and nanomodules, programmable logic devices, majority logic, computer-aided design, multiplexers

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of topical antagonistic issues regarding the implementation of new computer programming methods that can be used to reproduce heterogeneous binary functions of several arguments based on micro- and nanoelectronic multiplexer modules. The growth of specialization of modern large integrated circuits comes into conflict with their universality, which increases the cost of design work and reduces the production volumes of typonominal devices. The trade-off between specialization and versatility should be minimized by computer-aided design of micro- and nano-sized modules with programmable logic. Programming is not performed to create algorithms for processing discrete information, as implemented by a microprocessor, but by logical settings of multiplexer micro- and nanodevices. The results of the combined simulations obtained in the work confirm the equivalence of their functioning, as well as the advantages of cell-based Coulomb nanomultiplexers in reliability, technological scalability, energy efficiency, speed, and disadvantages in exclusively cryogenic ultra-low temperature applications. Obviously, the evolution of microelectronics will continue only in the context of the widespread introduction of nanoscale modules with new functional principles of operation.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Melnyk , State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)

Associated Professor

Department of Electronics, Robotics, Monitoring & IoT Technologies, 

References

P. Tougaw, S. Lent, and W. Porod, "Bistable saturation in coupled quantum cellular automata", Journal of Applied physics, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 3558–3566, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.354535

S. L. Kardigai, “Efficient design of logical structures and functions using nanotechnology based QCA, Intern,” Journal of Сomputer Аpplication, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 0975–0988, 2010.

E. Sicard and S. D. Bendhia, Advanced CMOS Cell Design, McGraw-Hill, 2007, 385 p.

J. L. Hennessy and D. A. Patterson, Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, Morgan Kaufmann, 2011, 856 p.

K. Walus, T. Dusart, C. Budiman, "QCA Designer: A rapid design and simulation tool for QCA," IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 26–39, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2003.820815

QCADesigner, version 2.0.3. Available at www.atips.ca.

B. Sen and S. Gosman, “Towards modular design of reliable QCA logic circuits using multiplexers,” Computer Electronics Eng, vol. 45, no. 2, pp.42–54, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.05.001

O. S. Melnyk and V. O. Kozarevych, “Arithmetic Logic Single-electron,” Electronics and Control Systems, vol. 2, no. 76, pp. 68–77, 2023. https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.76.17670

H. Cho and E. Swartzlander, “Adder and multiplier design in quantum-dots cellular automata,” IEEE Trans on Computers, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 721–729, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2009.21

S. Shin and C. Jeon, “Design of wire-crossing technics based on difference of cell in quantum-dot cellular automata,” Int. Journal of control and automation, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 153–165, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2014.7.4.14

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Melnyk , O. (2026). Nanodevices with Majority Structures. Electronics and Control Systems, 2(88), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.88.20977

Issue

Section

ELECTRONICS, ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INSTRUMENTATION AND RADIO ENGINEERING