CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE DESIGN OF MULTIMODAL SYMBOLIC SYSTEMS FOR CHILDREN’S SPACES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2026.40.43

Keywords:

multimodal symbolic systems, children’s spaces, wayfinding design, signs, routes, visual cues, tactile cues, auditory cues, spatial guidance, confirmation, PAF cycle

Abstract

Purpose. This article clarifies the conceptual foundations for designing multimodal symbolic systems in children’s spaces. It interprets the Perception–Action– Feedback (PAF) cycle as a design structuring logic and uses that logic to explain how visual, tactile, and auditory cues can work together as one spatial communication system. The aim is to show how multimodal cues can be organized coherently in child-centred environments. Methodology. The study adopts a systematic design-research approach that combines conceptual analysis, a synthesis of recent work on multimodal wayfinding and experiential graphic design, and a comparative reading of built cases. Three documented cases from museum and healthcare settings are examined to map how cue hierarchy, spatial sequencing, and confirmation mechanisms are structured through the PAF lens. The analysis is interpretive and design-oriented rather than experimental. Results. The article defines multimodal symbolic systems as spatial communication infrastructure and frames multimodality as coordinated cue organization rather than simple sensory layering. It develops a design-oriented reading of PAF in which perception supports identity and legibility, action supports movement and decision-making, and feedback supports confirmation and recovery. From this, the study derives a concise set of design implications and shows, through three cases, how the framework can be used to compare system organization across different children’s environments. Scientific novelty. The study reinterprets PAF as a design logic for multimodal symbolic systems and brings together a system-based account of identity, legibility, sequencing, and confirmation in children’s spaces. It also shifts discussion away from isolated cue variables toward the coordinated organization of symbolic environments. Practical relevance. The study offers a design-oriented framework that can support the planning and evaluation of multimodal symbolic systems in children’s spaces. Its results may be useful for designers, educators, museum planners, and healthcare professionals involved in shaping child-centered environments, particularly when organizing cue hierarchy, route sequencing, and confirmation mechanisms across different spatial settings.

References

Archello. Cayton Children’s Museum [Online]. URL: https://archello.com/project/cayton-childrensmuseum (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Architizer. Nationwide Children’s Hospital [Online]. URL: https://architizer.com/projects/nationwide-childrens-hospital-1/ (accessed: 15.03.2026).

Arthur P., Passini R. Wayfinding: People, signs, and architecture. McGraw-Hill, 1992.

Buckley M. G., Austen J. M., McGregor A. The role of distal landmarks and individual differences in acquiring spatial representations that support flexible and automatic wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2024. Vol. 98. Article 102391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102391

Cayton Children’s Museum. Explore Our Space [Online]. URL: https://www.caytonmuseum.org/exploreour-space (accessed: 15.03.2026).

De Villiers G., Costandius E., Brazier K., Perold-Bull K. Towards linguistic inclusivity: An exploration of the wayfinding system at Stellenbosch University, South Africa. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding. 2022. Vol. 6, no. 2. P. 31–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2022.v6.i2.a119

Devlin A. S. Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: Contributions from environmental psychology. Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 4, no. 4. P. 423–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040423

Giudice N. A., Guenther B. A., Jensen N. A., Haase K. N. Cognitive mapping without vision: Comparing wayfinding performance after learning from digital touchscreen-based multimodal maps vs. embossed tactile overlays. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020. Vol. 14. Article 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00087

GRAD. Nationwide Children’s [Online]. URL: https://www.grad.cc/nationwide-childrens (accessed: 15.03.2026).

Jamshidi S., Pati D. The role of maps and signage in interior wayfinding: An exploratory qualitative study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding. 2024. Vol. 8, no. 1. P. 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2024.v8.i1.a144

Kalantari S., Tripathi V., Kan J., Rounds J. D., Mostafavi A., Snell R., Cruz-Garza J. G. Evaluating the impacts of color, graphics, and architectural features on wayfinding in healthcare settings using EEG data and virtual response testing. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2022. Vol. 79. Article 101744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101744

Kuriakose B., Shrestha R., Sandnes F. E. Multimodal navigation systems for users with visual impairments – A review and analysis. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2020. Vol. 4, no. 4. Article 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040073

Lingwood J., Blades M., Farran E. K., Courbois Y., Matthews D. Using virtual environments to investigate wayfinding in 8- to 12-year-olds and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2018. Vol. 166. P. 178–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.012

Lingwood J., Farran E. K., Blades M., Courbois Y. Encouraging 5-year-olds to attend to landmarks: A way to improve children’s wayfinding strategies in a virtual environment. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015. Vol. 6. Article 174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00174

Luo D., Doucé L., Nys K. Multisensory museum experience: An integrative view and future research directions. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2024. P. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2024.2357071

Mishler A. D., Neider M. B. Improving wayfinding for older users with selective attention deficits. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications. 2017. Vol. 25, no. 1. P. 11–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804616659992

Nationwide Children’s Hospital. Hospital map and wayfinding [Online]. URL: https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/locations/main-hospital/hospital-map--wayfinding (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Ottink L., Buimer H., van Raalte B., Doeller C. F., van der Geest T. M., van Wezel R. J. A. Cognitive map formation supported by auditory, haptic, and multimodal information in persons with blindness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022. Vol. 140. Article 104797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104797

Petković G., Pasanec Preprotić S., Kozjan Cindrić A. Experiential graphic design: Informing, inspiring, and integrating people in physical spaces – A review. Buildings. 2025. Vol. 15, no. 11. Article 1862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111862

Pietroni E. Multisensory museums, hybrid realities, narration, and technological innovation: A discussion around new perspectives in experience design and sense of authenticity. Heritage. 2025. Vol. 8, no. 4. Article 130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8040130

RGD AccessAbility. SickKids [Online]. URL: https://accessability.rgd.ca/case-studies/sickkids/(accessed: 05.03.2026).

Tzeng S.-Y., Huang J.-S. Spatial forms and signage in wayfinding decision points for hospital outpatient services. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2009. Vol. 8, no. 2. P. 453–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.8.453

van der Bie J., Ben Allouch S., Jaschinski C. Communicating multimodal wayfinding messages for visually impaired people via wearables. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’19). Article 68. P. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3344419

Wabiński J., Mościcka A., Touya G. Guidelines for standardizing the design of tactile maps: A review of research and best practice. The Cartographic Journal. 2022. Vol. 59, no. 3. P. 239–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2022.2097760

Ward N. Accessible wayfinding: Empathy, human-centered design, and a blank slate. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding. 2017. Vol. 1, no. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2017.v1.i2.a11

Warren W. H. The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review. 2006. Vol. 113, no. 2. P. 358–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358

Yang Y., Merrill E. C. Wayfinding in children: A descriptive literature review of research methods. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 2022. Vol. 183, no. 6. P. 580–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2022.2103789

Zhang J., Zou Y., Li Y., Peng C., Jin D. Embodied power: How do museum tourists’ sensory experiences affect place identity? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2024. Vol. 60. P. 334–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.08.009

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Liu, J., & Skliarenko, N. V. (2026). CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE DESIGN OF MULTIMODAL SYMBOLIC SYSTEMS FOR CHILDREN’S SPACES. Theory and Practice of Design, (2 (40), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2026.40.43

Issue

Section

CULTURE AND ART