AESTHETIC AND ERGONOMIC FACTORS IN THE DESIGN OF A MEDICAL PROTECTIVE MASK WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF CONTEMPORARY DESIGN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2026.39.37

Keywords:

design, medical protective mask, aesthetics, ergonomics, form generation, facial proportions, harmonization

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide a scientific substantiation of a complex of aesthetic and ergonomic factors in the design of a medical protective mask as an object of contemporary design, as well as to define the principles of its form generation in relation to facial anthropometry, functional protection requirements, and visual-image representation within the structure of everyday and communicative human appearance. Methodology. The research methodology is based on an interdisciplinary integration of design analysis methods and an ergonomic approach. Morphological and compositional – proportional analyses of the product form were applied, taking into account the principles of harmonization and proportionality, including references to facial proportional relationships. An aesthetic – semantic analysis of the mask as an element of personal image and a carrier of communicative meanings in the post – pandemic sociocultural context was conducted. Elements of ergonomic assessment were aimed at correlating requirements for wearing comfort, fit density, fixation stability, and maintenance of the protective function with demands for visual expressiveness and the integrity of the silhouette-linear structure. Results. The study reveals that the design of a medical protective mask within the system of contemporary design should be based on the coordination of three interrelated dimensions: functional – protection, fit density, and hygienic properties; ergonomic-comfort, controllability of fit, and stability during speech and facial expressions; and aesthetic – compositional – harmonization with facial proportions, rhythmic – linear organization, and visual balance. The expediency of interpreting the mask as an object of form generation is substantiated, and design factors that enhance the aesthetic integration of the mask into the overall image in accordance with the context of use are systematized. Scientific novelty. Scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive conceptualization of the medical protective mask as an object of contemporary design in which aesthetic and ergonomic parameters function not as auxiliary characteristics but as system – forming factors of the design solution. The principles of harmonizing the mask form with facial proportions within a compositional – proportional framework are refined, and the interdependence between the ergonomic adequacy of the product and its visual correctness within the costume image’s structure is outlined. Practical relevance. The practical significance of the results consists in the possibility of applying the formulated provisions to the development of design requirements for medical mask projects, the creation of both mass-produced and individualized models, as well as to the expert evaluation of existing products according to the criteria of ergonomics and aesthetic integration into the user’s image.

References

Кузьменко В.В. Дизайн виробів для захисту органів дихання: інноваційні технології, сучасні матеріали : дис. … докт. філософії : 022 Дизайн. Київ,2025. 327 с.

Кузьменко В.В., Новак Д.С., Костіков M.П. Використання технологій обробки зображень для визначення антропометричних точок обличчя. Штучний інтелект та інформаційні технології : наукові праці Першої міжнар. наук.-практ. конф., м. Київ, 3–4 червня 2024 р. Київ : НУХТ, 2024. С. 66–69. URL: http://kist.ntu.edu.ua/konferencii/49_konf_2024.pdf (дата звернення: 09.09.2025).

Остапенко Н.В., Колосніченко О.В., Скрипченко А.Г., Арабаджи А.Г., Кузьменко В.В., Косточка А.О. Ергономічний підхід до проєктування

адаптивного одягу для реабілітації пацієнтів після COVID-19. Art and Design. 2022. № 4(20). С. 64–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2022.4.6.

Чеберячко С.І., Гридяєв В.В., Еннан А.А.-А., Чеберяко Ю.І., Абрамова Н.М., Книш І.М. Вибір респіраторів на основі результатів вимірювання антропометричних розмірів середньостатистичного робітника АКХЗ та Шеффілдівського манекену голови. Науковий вісник ДонНТУ. 2022. №1(8)– 2(9). C. 216–227. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.31474/2415-7902-2022-1(8)-2(9)-216-227

Blender. Wikipedia. URL: https://uk.wikipedia. org/wiki/Blender (дата звернення: 14.07.2024).

Cai M., Li H., Shen S., Wang Y., Yang Q. Customized design and 3D printing of face seal for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2018. Vol. 15, Iss. 3. Р. 226–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.20 17.1411598.

Cheberyachko S., Tretiakova L., Kolosnichenko M., Ostapenko N. Designing filtering halfmasks. Fibres and Textiles. 2020. Iss. 3(141). Р. 82–89.

URL: http://vat.ft.tul.cz/2020/3/VaT_2020_3_13.pdf. (дата звернення: 17.09.2025).

Clapp P.W., Sickbert-Bennett E.E., Samet J.M., Berntsen J., Zeman K.L., Anderson D. J., Weber D. J., Bennett W. D.Evaluation of Cloth Masks and Modified Procedure Masks as Personal Protective Equipment for the Public During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020, Vol. 181, № 4. Р. 463‑469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8168.

Farkas L.G., Katic M.J., Forrest C.R., Alt K.W., Bagič I., Baltadjiev G., Cunha E., Cvicelová M., Davies S., Erasmus I., Gillett-Netting R., Hajnis K., Kemkes-Grottenthaler A., Khomyakova I., Kumi A., Kgamphe J.S., Kayo-daigo N., Le T., Malinowski A., Negasheva M., Manolis S., Ogetürk M., Parvizrad R., Rösing F., Sahu P., Sforza C., Sivkov S., Sultanova N., Tomazo-Ravnik T., Tóth G., Uzun A., Yahia E. International anthropometric

study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2005. Vol. 16(4). Р. 615–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01. scs.0000171847.58031.9e.

3dMD Applications. from Healthcare to Artificial Intelligence. 3dMD. URL: https://3dmd.com/ (дата звернення: 08.10.2025).

Gardner A. This Dentist’s 60-Second Hack to Make Your Face Mask Fit Better Is Going Viral. Glamour. 2021. URL: www.glamour.com/story/this-dentist-60-second-hack-to-make-your-face-mask-fit-better-isgoing-viral (дата звернення: 08.10.2025).

How surgical masks are made. Thomasnet. 2020. URL: https://www.thomasnet.com/articles/other/how-surgical-masks-are-made/ (дата звернення: 20.08.2025).

Infographic: Using face masks in the community. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2020. URL: ttps://www.ecdc.europa.eu/

en/publications-data/infographic-using-face-maskscommunity (дата звернення: 26.05.2025).

Jordan D.J., Pritchard-Jones R. Tying a surgical mask to prevent fogging. Annals of The RoyalCollege of Surgeons of England. 2014. Vol. 96, № 2. Р. 165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2014.96.2.165.

Kashyap A., Singh K., Sabat D., Maini L. Fast and economic cardboard cutout use to increase complianceof face mask wear during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics & Trauma. 2020. Vol. 11, Suppl. 3. S. 298–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.04.032.

Kaya K.S., Türk B., Cankaya M., Seyhun N., Coşkun B.U. Assessment of Facial Analysis Measurements by Golden Proportion. Brazilian Journal of

Otorhinolaryngology. 2019. Vol. 85, Iss. 4. P. 494–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.07.009.

Kuzmenko V.V., Ostapenko N.V. Choosing a 3D scanner for the tasks of the designer. Теорія та практика дизайну. 2024. № 4(34). P. 344–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2024.34.37.

Mizumoto Y., Deguchi T.Sr., Fong K.W.С. Assessment of facial golden proportions among young Japanese women. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009. Vol. 136, Iss. 2. Р. 168–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajodo.2007.07.029.

Mueller A.V., Eden M.J., Oakes J.M., Bellini C., Fernandez L.A. Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Removal Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE. Matter. 2020. Vol. 3, Iss. 3. Р. 950–962. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.006.

Newman L. 6 Exciting Ways to Use LiDAR on iPhone. MUO. 2023. URL: https://www.makeuseof.com/iphone-lidar-uses/ (дата звернення: 12.02.2025).

O’Kelly E., Arora A., Pirog S., Pearson C., Ward J., Clarkson P.J. Face mask fit hacks: Improving the fit of KN95 masks and surgical masks with fit alteration techniques. PLoS ONE. 2022. Vol. 17(2). e0262830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262830.

Pan Y., Xi Q., Meng J., Chen X., Wu G. Development of a customized mask retainer for improving the fit performance of surgical masks. PLoS ONE. 2022. Vol. 17(12). e0278889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278889.

Rocchini C., Cignoni P., Montani C., Pingi P., Scopigno R. A low cost 3D scanner based on structured light. Computer Graphics Forum.

Vol. 20, Iss. 3. P. 299–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00522.

Rossetti A., De Menezes M., Rosati R., Ferrario V.F., Sforza C. The role of the golden proportion in the evaluation of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2013. Vol. 83(5). P. 801–808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/111812-883.1.

Sunilkumar L.N., Jadhav K.S., Nazirkar G., Singh S., Nagmode P.S., Ali F.M. Assessment of facial golden proportions among north maharashtrian population. Journal of International Oral Health. 2013. Vol. 5. P. 48–54. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/24155602/ (дата звернення: 21.11.2025).

Sureka B., Misra S. N95 respirator or triple layer surgical mask: Radiologist perspective. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2021. Vol. 31(S01). S. 198–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_350_20.

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Ostapenko , N., Kuzmenko , V., Struminska , T., Yalovyi , V., & Kolosnichenko, O. (2026). AESTHETIC AND ERGONOMIC FACTORS IN THE DESIGN OF A MEDICAL PROTECTIVE MASK WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF CONTEMPORARY DESIGN. Theory and Practice of Design, (1 (39), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2026.39.37