PERFORMANCE AND SPEED COMPARISON OF SURF AND ORB DESCRIPTORS

Authors

  • M. P. Mukhina National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • T. A. Yeremeieva National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.55.12716

Keywords:

Image matching, image feature, robust matching, image distortion

Abstract

Fast and robust image processing and matching is a very important task with various applications in computer vision and robotics. In this paper, we compare the performance of two different image matching techniques, i.e., by speed up robust features and by rotated robust independent elementary features, against different kinds of transformations and deformations such as scaling, rotation, noise, fisheye distortion, and cropping. For this purpose, we manually apply different types of transformations on original images and compute the matching evaluation parameters such as the number of key points in images, the matching rate, and the execution time required for each algorithm and we will show that which algorithm is the best more robust against each kind of distortion.

Author Biographies

M. P. Mukhina, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine

Educational & Research Institute of Information and Diagnostic Systems Aviation Computer-Integrated Complexes Department

Doctor of Engineering Science. Professor

T. A. Yeremeieva, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine

Educational & Research Institute of Information and Diagnostic Systems Aviation Computer-Integrated Complexes Department

6th year of study student

References

B. Moghaddam, C. Nastar and A. Pentland, “A Bayesian similarity measure for deformable image matching,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 235–244, 2001.

B. Shan, “A Novel Image Correlation Matching Approach,” JMM, vol. 5, no. 3, 2010.

K. Mikolajczyk, T. Tuytelaars, C. Schmid, A. Zisserman, J. Matas, F. Schaffalitzky, T. Kadir, and L. Van Gool, A comparison of affine region detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision, 65(1/2):43–72, 2005.

David G Lowe, “Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol.50, no. 2, 2004, pp. 91–110.

Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars and Luc Van Gool, "Speeded-up robust features (SURF)," Computer vision and image understanding, vol.110, no.3, 2008, pp. 346–359.

Downloads

How to Cite

Mukhina, M. P., & Yeremeieva, T. A. (2018). PERFORMANCE AND SPEED COMPARISON OF SURF AND ORB DESCRIPTORS. Electronics and Control Systems, 1(55), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.55.12716

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 55 (2018)

Section

THEORY AND METHODS OF SIGNAL PROCESSING

License

The scientific journal “Electronics and control systems” adheres to the principles of Open Access and provides free, immediate, and permanent access to all published materials without financial, technical, or legal barriers for readers.

All articles are published in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.

Copyright

Authors who publish their works in the journal “Electronics and control systems”:

  • retain the copyright to their publications;

  • grant the journal the right of first publication of the article;

  • agree to the distribution of their materials under the CC BY 4.0 license;

  • have the right to reuse, archive, and distribute their works (including in institutional and subject repositories), provided that proper reference is made to the original publication in the journal.